Judi Yost

As a content developer for Clarity, Judi Yost develops online and face-to-face professional development curriculum, assists countries in their adaptation of training materials, and conducts professional development trainings. Read more...

Do we really need a new search engine? Apparently, yes.

Judi Yost | April 16, 2009

We seem to be on a Google theme on these last few blogs, so it's fitting that by chance I stumbled across a new search engine this week.

You would think that no one would be interested in developing yet another search engine. Who would want to go against Google who now commands 63.5% of Web search? When Google first came out, I was its biggest fan--praised its relevant search results to anyone who would listen. But I have noticed something about Google results lately... It seems more and more, I am clicking links to completely worthless sites that have the right key words, but only include advertisements. Very

News & Events

Join Our Growing Team

Feb 3, 2012

Oregon Leadership Summit

Nov 11, 2011

Clarity Innovations Attending Adobe MAX

Sep 6, 2011

Contact Us

Toll-free: 877 683-3187

1001 SE Water Ave
Suite 250
Portland, Oregon 97214

Drupal for Firebug General MessagesThere were no messages sent to the general log. Please use "firep($item, $optional_title)" to output messages to this console.

Devel Module is Not InstalledPlease install and enable the Devel Module to display the SQL queries.

$form->comment_form

$form = (

[name] => array (

[#type] => [textfield]

[#title] => [Your name]

[#maxlength] => [60]

[#size] => [30]

[#default_value] => [Anonymous]

[#required] => [1]

)

[mail] => array (

[#type] => [textfield]

[#title] => [E-mail]

[#maxlength] => [64]

[#size] => [30]

[#default_value] => []

[#description] => [The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.]

[#required] => [1]

)

[homepage] => array (

[#type] => [textfield]

[#title] => [Homepage]

[#maxlength] => [255]

[#size] => [30]

[#default_value] => []

)

[comment_filter] => array (

[comment] => array (

[#type] => [textarea]

[#title] => [Comment]

[#rows] => [15]

[#default_value] => []

[#required] => [1]

)

[format] => array (

[1] => array (

[#type] => [value]

[#value] => [1]

[#parents] => array (

[0] => [format]

)

[format] => array (

[guidelines] => array (

[#title] => [Formatting guidelines]

[#value] => []

)

[2] => array (

[#value] => []

)

[cid] => array (

[#type] => [value]

[#value] => []

)

[pid] => array (

[#type] => [value]

[#value] => []

)

[nid] => array (

[#type] => [value]

[#value] => [379]

)

[uid] => array (

[#type] => [value]

[#value] => [0]

)

[submit] => array (

[#type] => [submit]

[#value] => [Save]

[#weight] => [19.0002]

)

[preview] => array (

[#type] => [button]

[#value] => [Preview]

[#weight] => [20.0002]

)

[#action] => [/home/comment/reply/379]

[#parameters] => array (

[0] => [comment_form]

[1] => array (

[storage] => []

[submitted] => []

[post] => array (

)

[2] => array (

[nid] => [379]

)

[3] => [Post new comment]

)

[#build_id] => [form-e608228e78733a5840ae88a8bef6b389]

[#type] => [form]

[#programmed] => []

[form_build_id] => array (

[#type] => [hidden]

[#value] => [form-e608228e78733a5840ae88a8bef6b389]

[#id] => [form-e608228e78733a5840ae88a8bef6b389]

[#name] => [form_build_id]

)

[form_id] => array (

[#type] => [hidden]

[#value] => [comment_form]

[#id] => [edit-comment-form]

)

[#id] => [comment-form]

[#description] => []

[#attributes] => array (

)

[#required] => []

[#tree] => []

[#parents] => array (

)

[#method] => [post]

[#after_build] => array (

[0] => [ckeditor_process_form]

[1] => [mollom_form_buttons_after_build]

)

[#validate] => array (

[0] => [comment_form_validate]

[1] => [mollom_validate_analysis]

[2] => [mollom_validate_captcha]

[3] => [mollom_validate_post]

)

[#submit] => array (

[0] => [mollom_form_pre_submit]

[1] => [comment_form_submit]

[2] => [mollom_form_submit]

)

[revision_information] => array (

[#attributes] => array (

[class] => [hideme]

)

[comment_settings] => array (

[#attributes] => array (

[class] => [hideme]

)

[mollom] => array (

[#type] => [mollom]

[#mollom_form] => array (

[form_id] => [comment_form]

[mode] => [1]

[enabled_fields] => array (

)

[module] => [comment]

[checks] => array (

[0] => [spam]

)

[discard] => [1]

[strictness] => [normal]

[title] => [Comment form]

[entity] => [comment]

[report access] => array (

[0] => [administer comments]

)

[report delete callback] => [comment_mollom_report_delete]

[bypass access] => array (

[0] => [administer comments]

)

[moderation callback] => [comment_mollom_form_moderation]

[elements] => array (

[subject] => [Subject]

[comment] => [Comment]

)

[mapping] => array (

[post_id] => [cid]

[post_title] => [subject]

[author_name] => [name]

[author_mail] => [mail]

[author_url] => [homepage]

)

[mail ids] => array (

)

[#weight] => [19.0001]

[#tree] => [1]

)

);

load $user->14

$user = (

[uid] => [14]

[name] => [jyost]

[pass] => [**Not shown for security reasons**]

[mail] => [jyost@clarity-innovations.com]

[mode] => [0]

[sort] => [0]

[threshold] => [0]

[theme] => []

[signature] => []

[created] => [1200484800]

[access] => [1317271507]

[login] => [1317144644]

[status] => [1]

[timezone] => [-25200]

[language] => []

[picture] => [files/pictures/picture-14.png]

[init] => [jyost@clarity-innovations.com]

[data] => [a:7:{s:7:"contact";i:1;s:14:"picture_delete";i:0;s:14:"picture_upload";s:0:"";s:13:"form_build_id";s:37:"form-d491a0f0907e57cdcd9b5473370d8047";s:7:"ldap_dn";s:72:"CN=Judi Yost,OU=Employees,OU=People,DC=pdx,DC=clarity-innovations,DC=com";s:11:"ldap_config";s:1:"1";s:17:"ldap_authentified";b:1;}]

[signature_format] => [1]

[timezone_name] => [America/Los_Angeles]

[contact] => [1]

[picture_delete] => [0]

[picture_upload] => []

[form_build_id] => [form-d491a0f0907e57cdcd9b5473370d8047]

[ldap_dn] => [CN=Judi Yost,OU=Employees,OU=People,DC=pdx,DC=clarity-innovations,DC=com]

[ldap_config] => [1]

[ldap_authentified] => [1]

[roles] => array (

[2] => [authenticated user]

[3] => [Contributors]

)

[profile_bio] => [As a content developer for Clarity, Judi Yost develops online and face-to-face professional development curriculum, assists countries in their adaptation of training materials, and conducts professional development trainings. <a href="/about/team/jyost">Read more...</a>]

[profile_title] => [Content Developer]

[profile_alumni_date] => []

[profile_firstname] => [Judi]

[profile_lastname] => [Yost]

[homepage] => []

[realname] => [Judi Yost]

[realname_save] => [jyost]

[nodewords] => array (

)

);

load $node->379

$node = (

[nid] => [379]

[type] => [blog]

[language] => []

[uid] => [14]

[status] => [1]

[created] => [1239927775]

[changed] => [1250546107]

[comment] => [2]

[promote] => [0]

[moderate] => [0]

[sticky] => [0]

[tnid] => [0]

[translate] => [0]

[vid] => [4251]

[revision_uid] => [1]

[title] => [Do we really need a new search engine? Apparently, yes.]

[body] => [ We seem to be on a Google theme on these last few blogs, so it's fitting that by chance I stumbled across a new search engine this week. You would think that no one would be interested in developing yet another search engine. Who would want to go against Google who now commands <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2009/tc20090319_203574.htm?campaign_id=yhoo" target="_blank">63.5% of Web search</a>? When Google first came out, I was its biggest fan--praised its relevant search results to anyone who would listen. But I have noticed something about Google results lately... It seems more and more, I am clicking links to completely worthless sites that have the right key words, but only include advertisements. Very  Duck Duck Go has been around since about September, 2008, but is just now starting to get noticed.   <img width="221" height="118" title="Duck Duck Go" alt="Duck Duck Go" src="/home/files/shared/ddg.jpg" /> I appreciated its clean interface and found its features interesting: <ul> <li>40 million spam/parked domains are omitted from search results</li> <li>Broad searches result in subtopics by concept-as well as direct links</li> <li>Definitions are provided as a "zero click" result at the top of the page</li> <li>Ambiguous words (like "apple") are detected and categorized for your selection</li> <li>Official sites are labeled</li> <li>Links are uncluttered-no focus on advertising</li> </ul> When I did identical searches on Google and Duck Duck Go, I did come across many of the same sites, but I did appreciate these new features. I also liked that you didn't have to go to another page for more links--the next "page" is simply added to your current page. That makes it easier to compare and evaluate results. <img width="400" height="496" title="PBL Search on Duck Duck Go" alt="PBL Search on Duck Duck Go" src="/home/files/shared/pbl-duck.jpg" /> I also wanted to see how it would fare with some dubious search terms--what happens when you search for terms that are typically inappropriate for students? I was quite impressed. Compared to results on Google, it was hands down the winner. I still wouldn't have students use a search engine without some type of filter, but initial search results were much "cleaner" and more "academic" than Google--even with the worst search terms. My daughter, a 9th grader, did an environmental health report on Hurricane Katrina last week. I wish I had known about Duck Duck Go then. Trying to find the information she needed on Google was surprisingly difficult for her. I think part of it was the cluttered results on Google. I did a quick search for Hurricane Katrina on Duck Duck Go and was pleased to see really useful results immediately. Images are not as easily found, but that might be to a students' benefit: they will actually know what Web site to reference as the source for the images they use. Here are the results of my search: <img width="400" height="349" title="Katrina search " alt="Katrina search " src="/home/files/shared/katrina.jpg" /> After searching for "Hurricane Katrina," I selected the 2005's Hurricane Katrina for uncluttered, targeted results: <img width="400" height="552" title="katrina results" alt="katrina results" src="/home/files/shared/katrinaresults.jpg" /> The only obvious search where Google prevails--at least so far in my tests--is when you're searching for a place or travel destination. It's hard to beat the integrated Google maps, driving directions, and other one-click links to the site's internal pages for information on its hours, calendar, features, and so on. I've added the <a target="_blank" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10536">DuckDuckGo toolbar</a> to my browser, Mozilla Firefox. It will be interesting to see how it fares over the next few weeks, and whether I become a new convert.]

[teaser] => [ We seem to be on a Google theme on these last few blogs, so it's fitting that by chance I stumbled across a new search engine this week. You would think that no one would be interested in developing yet another search engine. Who would want to go against Google who now commands <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2009/tc20090319_203574.htm?campaign_id=yhoo" target="_blank">63.5% of Web search</a>? When Google first came out, I was its biggest fan--praised its relevant search results to anyone who would listen. But I have noticed something about Google results lately... It seems more and more, I am clicking links to completely worthless sites that have the right key words, but only include advertisements. Very <!--[if gte vml 1]> So when I heard about <a href="http://duckduckgo.com/" target="_blank">Duck Duck Go</a>, I was definitely open to the possibility that searching could be improved. ]

[log] => []

[revision_timestamp] => [1250546107]

[format] => [2]

[name] => [jyost]

[picture] => [files/pictures/picture-14.png]

[path] => [about/blog/jyost/do-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes]

[print_display] => [1]

[print_display_comment] => [0]

[print_display_urllist] => [1]

);

view $node->379

$node = (

[nid] => [379]

[type] => [blog]

[language] => []

[uid] => [14]

[status] => [1]

[created] => [1239927775]

[changed] => [1250546107]

[comment] => [2]

[promote] => [0]

[moderate] => [0]

[sticky] => [0]

[tnid] => [0]

[translate] => [0]

[vid] => [4251]

[revision_uid] => [1]

[title] => [Do we really need a new search engine? Apparently, yes.]

[body] => [ We seem to be on a Google theme on these last few blogs, so it's fitting that by chance I stumbled across a new search engine this week. You would think that no one would be interested in developing yet another search engine. Who would want to go against Google who now commands <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2009/tc20090319_203574.htm?campaign_id=yhoo" target="_blank">63.5% of Web search</a>? When Google first came out, I was its biggest fan--praised its relevant search results to anyone who would listen. But I have noticed something about Google results lately... It seems more and more, I am clicking links to completely worthless sites that have the right key words, but only include advertisements. Very <!--[if gte vml 1]> So when I heard about <a href="http://duckduckgo.com/" target="_blank">Duck Duck Go</a>, I was definitely open to the possibility that searching could be improved. Duck Duck Go has been around since about September, 2008, but is just now starting to get noticed.   <img width="221" height="118" title="Duck Duck Go" alt="Duck Duck Go" src="/home/files/shared/ddg.jpg" /> I appreciated its clean interface and found its features interesting: <ul> <li>40 million spam/parked domains are omitted from search results</li> <li>Broad searches result in subtopics by concept-as well as direct links</li> <li>Definitions are provided as a "zero click" result at the top of the page</li> <li>Ambiguous words (like "apple") are detected and categorized for your selection</li> <li>Official sites are labeled</li> <li>Links are uncluttered-no focus on advertising</li> </ul> When I did identical searches on Google and Duck Duck Go, I did come across many of the same sites, but I did appreciate these new features. I also liked that you didn't have to go to another page for more links--the next "page" is simply added to your current page. That makes it easier to compare and evaluate results. <img width="400" height="496" title="PBL Search on Duck Duck Go" alt="PBL Search on Duck Duck Go" src="/home/files/shared/pbl-duck.jpg" /> I also wanted to see how it would fare with some dubious search terms--what happens when you search for terms that are typically inappropriate for students? I was quite impressed. Compared to results on Google, it was hands down the winner. I still wouldn't have students use a search engine without some type of filter, but initial search results were much "cleaner" and more "academic" than Google--even with the worst search terms. My daughter, a 9th grader, did an environmental health report on Hurricane Katrina last week. I wish I had known about Duck Duck Go then. Trying to find the information she needed on Google was surprisingly difficult for her. I think part of it was the cluttered results on Google. I did a quick search for Hurricane Katrina on Duck Duck Go and was pleased to see really useful results immediately. Images are not as easily found, but that might be to a students' benefit: they will actually know what Web site to reference as the source for the images they use. Here are the results of my search: <img width="400" height="349" title="Katrina search " alt="Katrina search " src="/home/files/shared/katrina.jpg" /> After searching for "Hurricane Katrina," I selected the 2005's Hurricane Katrina for uncluttered, targeted results: <img width="400" height="552" title="katrina results" alt="katrina results" src="/home/files/shared/katrinaresults.jpg" /> The only obvious search where Google prevails--at least so far in my tests--is when you're searching for a place or travel destination. It's hard to beat the integrated Google maps, driving directions, and other one-click links to the site's internal pages for information on its hours, calendar, features, and so on. I've added the <a target="_blank" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10536">DuckDuckGo toolbar</a> to my browser, Mozilla Firefox. It will be interesting to see how it fares over the next few weeks, and whether I become a new convert.]

[log] => []

[revision_timestamp] => [1250546107]

[format] => [2]

[name] => [Judi Yost]

[picture] => [files/pictures/picture-14.png]

[path] => [about/blog/jyost/do-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes]

[print_display] => [1]

[print_display_comment] => [0]

[print_display_urllist] => [1]

[tags] => []

[last_comment_timestamp] => [1239989125]

[last_comment_name] => [Malcolm B. Heath]

[comment_count] => [1]

[taxonomy] => array (

)

[nodewords] => array (

)

[build_mode] => [0]

[readmore] => [1]

[content] => array (

[body] => array (

[#value] => [ We seem to be on a Google theme on these last few blogs, so it's fitting that by chance I stumbled across a new search engine this week. You would think that no one would be interested in developing yet another search engine. Who would want to go against Google who now commands <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2009/tc20090319_203574.htm?campaign_id=yhoo" target="_blank">63.5% of Web search</a>? When Google first came out, I was its biggest fan--praised its relevant search results to anyone who would listen. But I have noticed something about Google results lately... It seems more and more, I am clicking links to completely worthless sites that have the right key words, but only include advertisements. Very <!--[if gte vml 1]> So when I heard about <a href="http://duckduckgo.com/" target="_blank">Duck Duck Go</a>, I was definitely open to the possibility that searching could be improved. Duck Duck Go has been around since about September, 2008, but is just now starting to get noticed.   <img width="221" height="118" title="Duck Duck Go" alt="Duck Duck Go" src="/home/files/shared/ddg.jpg" /> I appreciated its clean interface and found its features interesting: <ul> <li>40 million spam/parked domains are omitted from search results</li> <li>Broad searches result in subtopics by concept-as well as direct links</li> <li>Definitions are provided as a "zero click" result at the top of the page</li> <li>Ambiguous words (like "apple") are detected and categorized for your selection</li> <li>Official sites are labeled</li> <li>Links are uncluttered-no focus on advertising</li> </ul> When I did identical searches on Google and Duck Duck Go, I did come across many of the same sites, but I did appreciate these new features. I also liked that you didn't have to go to another page for more links--the next "page" is simply added to your current page. That makes it easier to compare and evaluate results. <img width="400" height="496" title="PBL Search on Duck Duck Go" alt="PBL Search on Duck Duck Go" src="/home/files/shared/pbl-duck.jpg" /> I also wanted to see how it would fare with some dubious search terms--what happens when you search for terms that are typically inappropriate for students? I was quite impressed. Compared to results on Google, it was hands down the winner. I still wouldn't have students use a search engine without some type of filter, but initial search results were much "cleaner" and more "academic" than Google--even with the worst search terms. My daughter, a 9th grader, did an environmental health report on Hurricane Katrina last week. I wish I had known about Duck Duck Go then. Trying to find the information she needed on Google was surprisingly difficult for her. I think part of it was the cluttered results on Google. I did a quick search for Hurricane Katrina on Duck Duck Go and was pleased to see really useful results immediately. Images are not as easily found, but that might be to a students' benefit: they will actually know what Web site to reference as the source for the images they use. Here are the results of my search: <img width="400" height="349" title="Katrina search " alt="Katrina search " src="/home/files/shared/katrina.jpg" /> After searching for "Hurricane Katrina," I selected the 2005's Hurricane Katrina for uncluttered, targeted results: <img width="400" height="552" title="katrina results" alt="katrina results" src="/home/files/shared/katrinaresults.jpg" /> The only obvious search where Google prevails--at least so far in my tests--is when you're searching for a place or travel destination. It's hard to beat the integrated Google maps, driving directions, and other one-click links to the site's internal pages for information on its hours, calendar, features, and so on. I've added the <a target="_blank" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10536">DuckDuckGo toolbar</a> to my browser, Mozilla Firefox. It will be interesting to see how it fares over the next few weeks, and whether I become a new convert.]

[#weight] => [0]

)

[#pre_render] => array (

[0] => [content_alter_extra_weights]

)

[#content_extra_fields] => array (

[title] => array (

[label] => [Title]

[description] => [Node module form.]

[weight] => [-5]

)

[body_field] => array (

[label] => [Body]

[description] => [Node module form.]

[weight] => [-3]

[view] => [body]

)

[revision_information] => array (

[label] => [Revision information]

[description] => [Node module form.]

[weight] => [1]

)

[author] => array (

[label] => [Authoring information]

[description] => [Node module form.]

[weight] => [0]

)

[options] => array (

[label] => [Publishing options]

[description] => [Node module form.]

[weight] => [3]

)

[comment_settings] => array (

[label] => [Comment settings]

[description] => [Comment module form.]

[weight] => [5]

)

[menu] => array (

[label] => [Menu settings]

[description] => [Menu module form.]

[weight] => [2]

)

[taxonomy] => array (

[label] => [Taxonomy]

[description] => [Taxonomy module form.]

[weight] => [-4]

)

[path] => array (

[label] => [Path settings]

[description] => [Path module form.]

[weight] => [6]

)

[print] => array (

[label] => [Printer, e-mail and PDF versions]

[description] => [Print module form.]

[weight] => [4]

)

[scheduler_settings] => array (

[label] => [Scheduler]

[description] => [Scheduler module form.]

[weight] => [-1]

)

[nodewords] => array (

[label] => [Meta tags]

[description] => [Meta tags fieldset.]

[weight] => [-2]

)

[print_links] => array (

[#prefix] => []

[#value] => []

[#suffix] => []

[#weight] => [-101]

)

[realname_save] => [jyost]

[realname] => [Judi Yost]

[service_links] => array (

[service-links-delicious] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/delicious.png" alt="del.icio.us" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://del.icio.us/post]

[query] => [url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&title=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes.]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Bookmark this post on del.icio.us.]

[class] => [service-links-delicious]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-digg] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/digg.png" alt="Digg" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://digg.com/submit]

[query] => [phase=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&title=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes.]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Digg this post on digg.com]

[class] => [service-links-digg]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-facebook] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/facebook.png" alt="Facebook" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php]

[query] => [u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&t=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes.]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Share on Facebook.]

[class] => [service-links-facebook]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-google] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/google.png" alt="Google" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark]

[query] => [op=add&bkmk=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&title=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes.]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Bookmark this post on Google.]

[class] => [service-links-google]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-identica] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/identica.png" alt="identi.ca" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://identi.ca/]

[query] => [action=newnotice&status_textarea=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes.+http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Dent this on identi.ca.]

[class] => [service-links-identica]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-reddit] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/reddit.png" alt="Reddit" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://reddit.com/submit]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Submit this post on reddit.com.]

[class] => [service-links-reddit]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-stumbleupon] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/stumbleit.png" alt="StumbleUpon" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Thumb this up at StumbleUpon]

[class] => [service-links-stumbleupon]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-technorati] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/technorati.png" alt="Technorati" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://technorati.com/search/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes]

[query] => []

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Search Technorati for links to this post.]

[class] => [service-links-technorati]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-twitter] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/twitter.png" alt="Twitter" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://twitter.com/share]

[query] => [url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&text=Do%20we%20really%20need%20a%20new%20search%20engine%3F%20Apparently%2C%20yes.]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Share this on Twitter]

[class] => [service-links-twitter]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-yahoo] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/yahoo.png" alt="Yahoo" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://bookmarks.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Bookmark this post on Yahoo.]

[class] => [service-links-yahoo]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service_links_rendered] => [<div class="service-links"><div class="service-label">Bookmark/Search this post with </div><ul class="links"><li class="service-links-delicious first"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&title=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes." title="Bookmark this post on del.icio.us." class="service-links-delicious" rel="nofollow"><img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/delicious.png" alt="del.icio.us" title="" width="16" height="16" /></a></li> <li class="service-links-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&title=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes." title="Digg this post on digg.com" class="service-links-digg" rel="nofollow"><img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/digg.png" alt="Digg" title="" width="16" height="16" /></a></li> <li class="service-links-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&t=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes." title="Share on Facebook." class="service-links-facebook" rel="nofollow"><img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/facebook.png" alt="Facebook" title="" width="16" height="16" /></a></li> <li class="service-links-google"><a href="http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=add&bkmk=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&title=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes." title="Bookmark this post on Google." class="service-links-google" rel="nofollow"><img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/google.png" alt="Google" title="" width="16" height="16" /></a></li> <li class="service-links-identica"><a href="http://identi.ca/?action=newnotice&status_textarea=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes.+http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes" title="Dent this on identi.ca." class="service-links-identica" rel="nofollow"><img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/identica.png" alt="identi.ca" title="" width="16" height="16" /></a></li> <li class="service-links-reddit"><a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&title=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes." title="Submit this post on reddit.com." class="service-links-reddit" rel="nofollow"><img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/reddit.png" alt="Reddit" title="" width="16" height="16" /></a></li> <li class="service-links-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&title=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes." title="Thumb this up at StumbleUpon" class="service-links-stumbleupon" rel="nofollow"><img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/stumbleit.png" alt="StumbleUpon" title="" width="16" height="16" /></a></li> <li class="service-links-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/search/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes" title="Search Technorati for links to this post." class="service-links-technorati" rel="nofollow"><img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/technorati.png" alt="Technorati" title="" width="16" height="16" /></a></li> <li class="service-links-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&text=Do%20we%20really%20need%20a%20new%20search%20engine%3F%20Apparently%2C%20yes." title="Share this on Twitter" class="service-links-twitter" rel="nofollow"><img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/twitter.png" alt="Twitter" title="" width="16" height="16" /></a></li> <li class="service-links-yahoo last"><a href="http://bookmarks.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes&t=Do+we+really+need+a+new+search+engine%3F+Apparently%2C+yes." title="Bookmark this post on Yahoo." class="service-links-yahoo" rel="nofollow"><img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/yahoo.png" alt="Yahoo" title="" width="16" height="16" /></a></li> </ul></div>]

);

alter $node->379

$node = (

[nid] => [379]

[type] => [blog]

[language] => []

[uid] => [14]

[status] => [1]

[created] => [1239927775]

[changed] => [1250546107]

[comment] => [2]

[promote] => [0]

[moderate] => [0]

[sticky] => [0]

[tnid] => [0]

[translate] => [0]

[vid] => [4251]

[revision_uid] => [1]

[title] => [Do we really need a new search engine? Apparently, yes.]

[body] => [ We seem to be on a Google theme on these last few blogs, so it's fitting that by chance I stumbled across a new search engine this week. You would think that no one would be interested in developing yet another search engine. Who would want to go against Google who now commands <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2009/tc20090319_203574.htm?campaign_id=yhoo" target="_blank">63.5% of Web search</a>? When Google first came out, I was its biggest fan--praised its relevant search results to anyone who would listen. But I have noticed something about Google results lately... It seems more and more, I am clicking links to completely worthless sites that have the right key words, but only include advertisements. Very <!--[if gte vml 1]> So when I heard about <a href="http://duckduckgo.com/" target="_blank">Duck Duck Go</a>, I was definitely open to the possibility that searching could be improved. Duck Duck Go has been around since about September, 2008, but is just now starting to get noticed.   <img width="221" height="118" title="Duck Duck Go" alt="Duck Duck Go" src="/home/files/shared/ddg.jpg" /> I appreciated its clean interface and found its features interesting: <ul> <li>40 million spam/parked domains are omitted from search results</li> <li>Broad searches result in subtopics by concept-as well as direct links</li> <li>Definitions are provided as a "zero click" result at the top of the page</li> <li>Ambiguous words (like "apple") are detected and categorized for your selection</li> <li>Official sites are labeled</li> <li>Links are uncluttered-no focus on advertising</li> </ul> When I did identical searches on Google and Duck Duck Go, I did come across many of the same sites, but I did appreciate these new features. I also liked that you didn't have to go to another page for more links--the next "page" is simply added to your current page. That makes it easier to compare and evaluate results. <img width="400" height="496" title="PBL Search on Duck Duck Go" alt="PBL Search on Duck Duck Go" src="/home/files/shared/pbl-duck.jpg" /> I also wanted to see how it would fare with some dubious search terms--what happens when you search for terms that are typically inappropriate for students? I was quite impressed. Compared to results on Google, it was hands down the winner. I still wouldn't have students use a search engine without some type of filter, but initial search results were much "cleaner" and more "academic" than Google--even with the worst search terms. My daughter, a 9th grader, did an environmental health report on Hurricane Katrina last week. I wish I had known about Duck Duck Go then. Trying to find the information she needed on Google was surprisingly difficult for her. I think part of it was the cluttered results on Google. I did a quick search for Hurricane Katrina on Duck Duck Go and was pleased to see really useful results immediately. Images are not as easily found, but that might be to a students' benefit: they will actually know what Web site to reference as the source for the images they use. Here are the results of my search: <img width="400" height="349" title="Katrina search " alt="Katrina search " src="/home/files/shared/katrina.jpg" /> After searching for "Hurricane Katrina," I selected the 2005's Hurricane Katrina for uncluttered, targeted results: <img width="400" height="552" title="katrina results" alt="katrina results" src="/home/files/shared/katrinaresults.jpg" /> The only obvious search where Google prevails--at least so far in my tests--is when you're searching for a place or travel destination. It's hard to beat the integrated Google maps, driving directions, and other one-click links to the site's internal pages for information on its hours, calendar, features, and so on. I've added the <a target="_blank" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10536">DuckDuckGo toolbar</a> to my browser, Mozilla Firefox. It will be interesting to see how it fares over the next few weeks, and whether I become a new convert.]

[log] => []

[revision_timestamp] => [1250546107]

[format] => [2]

[name] => [Judi Yost]

[picture] => [files/pictures/picture-14.png]

[path] => [about/blog/jyost/do-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes]

[print_display] => [1]

[print_display_comment] => [0]

[print_display_urllist] => [1]

[tags] => []

[last_comment_timestamp] => [1239989125]

[last_comment_name] => [Malcolm B. Heath]

[comment_count] => [1]

[taxonomy] => array (

)

[nodewords] => array (

)

[build_mode] => [0]

[readmore] => [1]

[content] => array (

[print_links] => array (

[#weight] => [-101]

[#suffix] => []

[#value] => []

[#prefix] => []

[#title] => []

[#description] => []

[#printed] => [1]

)

[body] => array (

[#weight] => [-3]

[#title] => []

[#description] => []

[#printed] => [1]

)

[#pre_render] => array (

[0] => [content_alter_extra_weights]

)

[#content_extra_fields] => array (

[title] => array (

[label] => [Title]

[description] => [Node module form.]

[weight] => [-5]

)

[body_field] => array (

[label] => [Body]

[description] => [Node module form.]

[weight] => [-3]

[view] => [body]

)

[revision_information] => array (

[label] => [Revision information]

[description] => [Node module form.]

[weight] => [1]

)

[author] => array (

[label] => [Authoring information]

[description] => [Node module form.]

[weight] => [0]

)

[options] => array (

[label] => [Publishing options]

[description] => [Node module form.]

[weight] => [3]

)

[comment_settings] => array (

[label] => [Comment settings]

[description] => [Comment module form.]

[weight] => [5]

)

[menu] => array (

[label] => [Menu settings]

[description] => [Menu module form.]

[weight] => [2]

)

[taxonomy] => array (

[label] => [Taxonomy]

[description] => [Taxonomy module form.]

[weight] => [-4]

)

[path] => array (

[label] => [Path settings]

[description] => [Path module form.]

[weight] => [6]

)

[print] => array (

[label] => [Printer, e-mail and PDF versions]

[description] => [Print module form.]

[weight] => [4]

)

[scheduler_settings] => array (

[label] => [Scheduler]

[description] => [Scheduler module form.]

[weight] => [-1]

)

[nodewords] => array (

[label] => [Meta tags]

[description] => [Meta tags fieldset.]

[weight] => [-2]

)

[#title] => []

[#description] => []

[#children] => [ We seem to be on a Google theme on these last few blogs, so it's fitting that by chance I stumbled across a new search engine this week. You would think that no one would be interested in developing yet another search engine. Who would want to go against Google who now commands <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2009/tc20090319_203574.htm?campaign_id=yhoo" target="_blank">63.5% of Web search</a>? When Google first came out, I was its biggest fan--praised its relevant search results to anyone who would listen. But I have noticed something about Google results lately... It seems more and more, I am clicking links to completely worthless sites that have the right key words, but only include advertisements. Very <!--[if gte vml 1]> So when I heard about <a href="http://duckduckgo.com/" target="_blank">Duck Duck Go</a>, I was definitely open to the possibility that searching could be improved. Duck Duck Go has been around since about September, 2008, but is just now starting to get noticed.   <img width="221" height="118" title="Duck Duck Go" alt="Duck Duck Go" src="/home/files/shared/ddg.jpg" /> I appreciated its clean interface and found its features interesting: <ul> <li>40 million spam/parked domains are omitted from search results</li> <li>Broad searches result in subtopics by concept-as well as direct links</li> <li>Definitions are provided as a "zero click" result at the top of the page</li> <li>Ambiguous words (like "apple") are detected and categorized for your selection</li> <li>Official sites are labeled</li> <li>Links are uncluttered-no focus on advertising</li> </ul> When I did identical searches on Google and Duck Duck Go, I did come across many of the same sites, but I did appreciate these new features. I also liked that you didn't have to go to another page for more links--the next "page" is simply added to your current page. That makes it easier to compare and evaluate results. <img width="400" height="496" title="PBL Search on Duck Duck Go" alt="PBL Search on Duck Duck Go" src="/home/files/shared/pbl-duck.jpg" /> I also wanted to see how it would fare with some dubious search terms--what happens when you search for terms that are typically inappropriate for students? I was quite impressed. Compared to results on Google, it was hands down the winner. I still wouldn't have students use a search engine without some type of filter, but initial search results were much "cleaner" and more "academic" than Google--even with the worst search terms. My daughter, a 9th grader, did an environmental health report on Hurricane Katrina last week. I wish I had known about Duck Duck Go then. Trying to find the information she needed on Google was surprisingly difficult for her. I think part of it was the cluttered results on Google. I did a quick search for Hurricane Katrina on Duck Duck Go and was pleased to see really useful results immediately. Images are not as easily found, but that might be to a students' benefit: they will actually know what Web site to reference as the source for the images they use. Here are the results of my search: <img width="400" height="349" title="Katrina search " alt="Katrina search " src="/home/files/shared/katrina.jpg" /> After searching for "Hurricane Katrina," I selected the 2005's Hurricane Katrina for uncluttered, targeted results: <img width="400" height="552" title="katrina results" alt="katrina results" src="/home/files/shared/katrinaresults.jpg" /> The only obvious search where Google prevails--at least so far in my tests--is when you're searching for a place or travel destination. It's hard to beat the integrated Google maps, driving directions, and other one-click links to the site's internal pages for information on its hours, calendar, features, and so on. I've added the <a target="_blank" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10536">DuckDuckGo toolbar</a> to my browser, Mozilla Firefox. It will be interesting to see how it fares over the next few weeks, and whether I become a new convert.]

[#printed] => [1]

)

[realname_save] => [jyost]

[realname] => [Judi Yost]

[homepage] => []

[service_links] => array (

[service-links-delicious] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/delicious.png" alt="del.icio.us" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://del.icio.us/post]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Bookmark this post on del.icio.us.]

[class] => [service-links-delicious]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-digg] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/digg.png" alt="Digg" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://digg.com/submit]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Digg this post on digg.com]

[class] => [service-links-digg]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-facebook] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/facebook.png" alt="Facebook" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Share on Facebook.]

[class] => [service-links-facebook]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-google] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/google.png" alt="Google" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Bookmark this post on Google.]

[class] => [service-links-google]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-identica] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/identica.png" alt="identi.ca" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://identi.ca/]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Dent this on identi.ca.]

[class] => [service-links-identica]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-reddit] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/reddit.png" alt="Reddit" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://reddit.com/submit]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Submit this post on reddit.com.]

[class] => [service-links-reddit]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-stumbleupon] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/stumbleit.png" alt="StumbleUpon" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Thumb this up at StumbleUpon]

[class] => [service-links-stumbleupon]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-technorati] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/technorati.png" alt="Technorati" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://technorati.com/search/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes]

[query] => []

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Search Technorati for links to this post.]

[class] => [service-links-technorati]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-twitter] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/twitter.png" alt="Twitter" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://twitter.com/share]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Share this on Twitter]

[class] => [service-links-twitter]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-yahoo] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/yahoo.png" alt="Yahoo" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://bookmarks.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Bookmark this post on Yahoo.]

[class] => [service-links-yahoo]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[links] => array (

[blog_usernames_blog] => array (

[title] => [Judi Yost's blog]

[href] => [blog/14]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Read Judi Yost's latest blog entries.]

)

[print_html] => array (

[href] => [print/about/blog/jyost/do-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes]

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/print/icons/print_icon.gif" alt="Print this page" title="Print this page" width="16" height="16" class="print-icon" />]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Display a printer-friendly version of this page.]

[class] => [print-page]

[onclick] => [window.open(this.href); return false]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

[query] => []

)

[service-links-delicious] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/delicious.png" alt="del.icio.us" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://del.icio.us/post]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Bookmark this post on del.icio.us.]

[class] => [service-links-delicious]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-digg] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/digg.png" alt="Digg" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://digg.com/submit]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Digg this post on digg.com]

[class] => [service-links-digg]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-facebook] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/facebook.png" alt="Facebook" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Share on Facebook.]

[class] => [service-links-facebook]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-google] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/google.png" alt="Google" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Bookmark this post on Google.]

[class] => [service-links-google]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-identica] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/identica.png" alt="identi.ca" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://identi.ca/]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Dent this on identi.ca.]

[class] => [service-links-identica]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-reddit] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/reddit.png" alt="Reddit" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://reddit.com/submit]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Submit this post on reddit.com.]

[class] => [service-links-reddit]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-stumbleupon] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/stumbleit.png" alt="StumbleUpon" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Thumb this up at StumbleUpon]

[class] => [service-links-stumbleupon]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-technorati] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/technorati.png" alt="Technorati" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://technorati.com/search/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarity-innovations.com%2Fhome%2Fabout%2Fblog%2Fjyost%2Fdo-we-really-need-new-search-engine-apparently-yes]

[query] => []

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Search Technorati for links to this post.]

[class] => [service-links-technorati]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-twitter] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/twitter.png" alt="Twitter" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://twitter.com/share]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Share this on Twitter]

[class] => [service-links-twitter]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

[service-links-yahoo] => array (

[title] => [<img src="/home/sites/all/modules/service_links/images/yahoo.png" alt="Yahoo" title="" width="16" height="16" />]

[href] => [http://bookmarks.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet]

[attributes] => array (

[title] => [Bookmark this post on Yahoo.]

[class] => [service-links-yahoo]

[rel] => [nofollow]

)

[html] => [1]

)

);

$view->news

$view = (

[db_table] => [views_view]

[base_table] => [node]

[args] => array (

)

[use_ajax] => []

[result] => array (

)

[pager] => array (

[use_pager] => []

[items_per_page] => [10]

[element] => [0]

[offset] => [0]

[current_page] => [0]

)

[old_view] => array (

[0] => []

)

[current_display] => [block_1]

[vid] => [3]

[name] => [news]

[description] => []

[tag] => []

[core] => [0]

[display] => array (

$spacing [default] => stdClass (

)

$spacing [page_1] => stdClass (

)

$spacing [block_1] => stdClass (

)

[type] => [Normal]

[loaded] => [1]

[executed] => []

[built] => []

[build_info] => array (

)

[attachment_before] => []

[attachment_after] => []

$spacing [display_handler] => stdClass (

)

);

$view->blog_posts

$view = (

[db_table] => [views_view]

[base_table] => [node]

[args] => array (

)

[use_ajax] => []

[result] => array (

)

[pager] => array (

[use_pager] => []

[items_per_page] => [10]

[element] => [0]

[offset] => [0]

[current_page] => [0]

)

[old_view] => array (

[0] => []

)

[current_display] => [block_1]

[vid] => [4]

[name] => [blog_posts]

[description] => [Blog Posts]

[tag] => []

[core] => [0]

[display] => array (

$spacing [default] => stdClass (

)

$spacing [page_1] => stdClass (

)

$spacing [block_1] => stdClass (

)

$spacing [feed_1] => stdClass (

)

[type] => [Normal]

[loaded] => [1]

[executed] => []

[built] => []

[build_info] => array (

)

[attachment_before] => []

[attachment_after] => []

$spacing [display_handler] => stdClass (

)

);

This feature is only available in Drupal 7.